5.16.2004
Gah, I hate the Lakers.
I have to give them credit though. I wrote them off for dead after Game 2, and was quite vocal about it. The Spurs just looked hungrier, and played together better than the Lakers were.
I guess the Spurs would have went as far as Tony Parker was going to take them. It's a shame he only took them to Game 2. But the Lakers stepped up, and their role players, something they still have a definite lack of, did the job when needed.
I'm guessing Derek Fisher's game-winner basically was the final poked hole in the Spurs' balloon. They looked defeated in Game Six, even when the game was being played. The only ones who didn't have their heads up their asses were Manu and Tim Duncan. But the team definitely did not look like they were in the game--something I had said about the Lakers in Game 2.
Oh well. Here's pulling for Minnesota or Sacramento. Congrats Los Angeles, from someone whose opinion doesn't matter to you.
I have to give them credit though. I wrote them off for dead after Game 2, and was quite vocal about it. The Spurs just looked hungrier, and played together better than the Lakers were.
I guess the Spurs would have went as far as Tony Parker was going to take them. It's a shame he only took them to Game 2. But the Lakers stepped up, and their role players, something they still have a definite lack of, did the job when needed.
I'm guessing Derek Fisher's game-winner basically was the final poked hole in the Spurs' balloon. They looked defeated in Game Six, even when the game was being played. The only ones who didn't have their heads up their asses were Manu and Tim Duncan. But the team definitely did not look like they were in the game--something I had said about the Lakers in Game 2.
Oh well. Here's pulling for Minnesota or Sacramento. Congrats Los Angeles, from someone whose opinion doesn't matter to you.
